| | 45 | WHICH INSTRUMENTS ARE AFFECTED? |
|---|
| | 46 | =============================== |
|---|
| | 47 | Only a preliminary estimate has been made by checking for the |
|---|
| | 48 | existence of throughput files that are not precisely equal to zero at |
|---|
| | 49 | both endpoints. This is an overestimate, because some files, such as |
|---|
| | 50 | longpass filters and internal optics, should not in fact fall to zero. |
|---|
| | 51 | |
|---|
| | 52 | According to this preliminary estimate, |
|---|
| | 53 | ACS, NICMOS, and STIS have many files that are affected. |
|---|
| | 54 | COS has a few. WFPC3 has only 2 aperture files. |
|---|
| | 55 | WFPC2 has many; so do FOC,FOS,HRS,HSP. |
|---|
| | 56 | |
|---|
| | 57 | All supported non-HST modes (Johnson, etc) are unaffected. |
|---|
| | 58 | |
|---|
| 78 | | |
|---|
| | 94 | |
|---|
| | 95 | |
|---|
| | 96 | How can we minimize the work required? |
|---|
| | 97 | -------------------------------------- |
|---|
| | 98 | The NICMOS team recommends the following actions to minimize the work |
|---|
| | 99 | required by the teams: |
|---|
| | 100 | |
|---|
| | 101 | - In changing the files: |
|---|
| | 102 | |
|---|
| | 103 | - define a standard modification, eg, "add an extra point 0.001A |
|---|
| | 104 | from the current end of the table with throughput=0". Then SSB |
|---|
| | 105 | could write a script that would apply this change, and the teams |
|---|
| | 106 | would only need to provide a list of affected files. |
|---|
| | 107 | |
|---|
| | 108 | It would be possible to selectively hand-edit files that warrant |
|---|
| | 109 | more sophisticated extrapolation. |
|---|
| | 110 | |
|---|
| | 111 | - In reducing the testing/validation load: |
|---|
| | 112 | |
|---|
| | 113 | - The algorithm described above, by essentially making a step |
|---|
| | 114 | function just past the current end of the defined data, would |
|---|
| | 115 | come closest to the current SYNPHOT behavior, which would in |
|---|
| | 116 | turn minimize the expected change, thus making it easier to |
|---|
| | 117 | validate the test results. |
|---|
| | 118 | |
|---|
| | 119 | - Using the ETC regression tests (ie, the last public release of |
|---|
| | 120 | the ETC software, using synphot) as the pre-delivery tests would |
|---|
| | 121 | preclude the need to invent new tests. |
|---|
| | 122 | |
|---|
| | 123 | - Establishing an appropriately small difference threshold, below |
|---|
| | 124 | which the tests would be validated, would further make the |
|---|
| | 125 | validation stage easier. |
|---|
| | 126 | |
|---|
| | 127 | |
|---|
| | 128 | |
|---|